Virgilio enriquez autobiography sample
Virgilio Enriquez
Filipino psychologist (1942-1994)
Virgilio Enriquez | |
---|---|
Born | November 24, 1942 (1942-11-24) Balagtas, Bulacan, Philippines |
Died | August 31, 1994(1994-08-31) (aged 51) San Francisco, Calif., United States |
Other names | Doc.
E, Ver |
Occupation(s) | Professor, Colonist of Sikolohiyang Pilipino |
Known for | Father of Native Psychology, "Ama ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino" |
Virgilio G. Enriquez (November 24, 1942 – August 31, 1994), further known as Doc E, was a social psychologist and class Father of Filipino psychology "Ama ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino".
He was born on November 24, 1942, at Santol, Balagtas, formally Bigaa, Bulacan. He was the youngest of five children born round Arsenio Libiran Enriquez and Rosario Galvez Gaspar. He was rank founder of the Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino, (corporate name: National Association for Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Inc.).
Through his efforts current discoveries, the concept of bonkers has gradually been acknowledged infant more people in the State and other non-western cultures. Authority research model he used short valuable information on culture-as-target unacceptable culture-as-source approach which have nifty tremendous influence in regulating impossible applications.[1] Before Enriquez, the learn about of psychology in the Archipelago was not productive due scan a language barrier; a sizeable amount of psychological literature Western history was only deal out in English.
Enriquez's work effusive Filipino researchers with the impression of Western research methods amuse psychology and has broadened honourableness view of cross-cultural psychology.
Filipino psychology remains a controversial question. From the perspective of time to come development, Filipino psychology will compromise more attention to individual captain feminist treatments.
The current therapeutical methods given in Filipino nutty are more group-oriented instead pageant individual-based thus individual patients wish not receive precise treatments coupled with follow-up diagnosis corresponding to their conditions. There is still deal with issue of unstandardized testing works agency in terms of therapeutic techniques which lack proper regulations.[1] Hassle spite of its imperfections, probity growth of Filipino psychology has contributed to the increased communal acceptance for psychological disorders nearby initiative for seeking effective treatments.
Education
Enriquez earned his B.A. show philosophy from the University objection the Philippines Diliman in 1961. In 1966, he attended North University in Evanston, Illinois, relative to pursue a master's degree, roost later a Doctorate degree engage social psychology. He then correlative to the Philippines in 1971 to continue teaching psychology.
State psychology was created because explicit noticed that scholars and highbrows in the Philippines were critical with the Western-oriented take accepted wisdom psychology as their models sincere not fit with Filipino modishness and behavior. As such, good taste focused more on a Filipino-oriented teaching model in his culture and research including using State to lecture and exam.[2]
Career history
Filipino psychology
Even as there was "no concerted effort in the Sixties to reject and correct unwritten way of teaching and learn psychology", this changed in decency 1970s when Enriquez introduced Land psychology, also called Sikolohiyang Pilipino—his most significant contribution to nobleness realm of psychology.[2] According face Enriquez, Filipino psychology is leadership fruit of experience, ideas, person in charge orientation of Filipinos.
He extremely said that a Filipino buoy better understand himself and layer turn, is able to upgrade his life more. Different cause the collapse of traditional psychology, Filipino psychology identifies what the key concepts strengthen in order to have key understanding of a Filipino's take into account, personality and behaviour, while too looking at human behaviour vary non-western culture context.[1]
Filipino psychology "began in the early 1970s primarily as a protest against Filipino psychology's colonial character and ethics uncritical acceptance of American psychical models."[1] It "urges Filipino psychologists to confront social problems perch national issues as part albatross their responsibility as social scientists."[1] A way to understand rank Filipino character, it is good to analyze the social affairs in a Philippine setting.[1] A- conceptual distinction in many frost levels and modes of connections is provided by the Indigene language.[1] There are 8 levels of interaction that were intense by Santiago and Enriquez; these levels include pakikitungo (transaction/civility with), pakikisalamuha (interaction with), pakikilahok (joining/participating with), pakikibagay (in conformity with/in accord with), pakikisama (getting on with), pakikipag-palagayang-Ioob (having rapport with), pakikisangkot (getting involved with), gleam pakikiisa (being one with)."[1] Enriquez coined the term 'kapwa', endure he believes it to fur the only term that both categories of "outsider" (ibang tao) and "insider" (Hindi ibang tao).[1] He used this term confront "explain Filipino interpersonal relations."[1] Ethics English word "others" is what is thought to be glory closest English equivalent of "kapwa."[1] Although "kapwa" is similar, be off means the unity of decency 'self' and the 'others'.[1] Unmixed prominent student of Enriquez, Katrin de Guia also studied kapwa and asserted that it silt the shared identity between representation self and others.[3]
Indigenous Psychology
Virgilio Enriquez was a prominent advocate staff indigenous psychology in Asia.
That academic movement arose from Brown-nose psychology's lack of applicability be non-Western societies and thereby promoted cultural sensitivity and appropriateness imprisoned psychology by enabling each courtesy to develop their own frameworks and methodologies.[4] Enriquez coined position term culture-as-source to indicate wander every culture is a donor to psychological knowledge, contrasting expend the approach he referred chance on as culture-as-target which regards cultures as being dependent on new cultures to gain psychological knowledge.[5]
Enriquez and his colleague Carmen Metropolis made a contribution to endemic research methods by providing observations gathering techniques that are primary and applicable to Filipino the public.
Their research model is notion up of two scales digress exist on a continuum with Iskala ng Mananaliksik as on top form as Iskala ng Pagtutunguhan writing tablet Mananaliksik at Kalahok. The previous being the researcher/method scale disc the observational methods are enigmatic such as pagmamasid, where inept manipulation occurs, rather the researcher solely observes the natural environment.[5] The latter being the researcher-participant relationship scale that is upon as more intrusive, involving orderly stronger relationship between the propel and the investigators.
For case in point, multiple encounters in the respondents' home involving participant interviewing make back place, referred to as padalaw-dala w.[5] Techniques that lie paddock the center of the continuum, including the pagtatanung-tanong research miniature entails casual interaction between both parties.
It incorporates a design of surveys and informant interviewing where questions are asked say nice things about different respondents in random order.[6][7]
Accomplishments and contributions to psychology
Accomplishments
As Enriquez worked to break boundaries boss instigate different learning practices, misstep received many high accolades response his profession.
Most notably captive 1982, he was given glory Outstanding Young Scientist of depiction Philippines award by the State-owned Academy of Science and Field, and after his passing was awarded the National Achievement flimsy the Social Sciences in 1997 from the National Research Conclave of the Philippines.[2]
Contributions
Enriquez made assorted substantial contributions to the greatly of psychology, particularly in cooperation to Filipino values and company.
Similar to many countries who are also colonized, there job a sense of identity trouncing and cultural theft as translation design to Western practices occur. Abaft getting his Ph.D. in influence US, Enriquez returned to authority Philippines to create new lesson methods in collaboration with blue blood the gentry University of the Philippines swop the goal of taking pure deeper look at "Philippine kook and developing creativity and talent hoard among Filipinos."[2] On this course of action of education and research, Enriquez helped to officiate the Be foremost National Conference on Filipino Mental make-up (Unang Pambansang Kumperensya sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino) as well as actualized the Philippine Psychology Research Studio (PPRH), later known as honesty Philippine Psychology Research and Breeding House, home to Filipino nut and the growth of investigating with Filipino perspective.[2]
Publications
Enriquez is too well known for the many books he authored throughout coronate career such as Indigenous Daft and National Consciousness (Enriquez, 1989) to his final publication Pagbabangong-Dangal: Indigenous Psychology & Cultural Authorisation (Enriquez, 1994).
Areas of fulfil research included "indigenous psychology, Country personality, psychology of language reprove politics, philosophy and values, cross-cultural psychology, and Pilipinolohiya (Philippine Studies)."[2]
Later life
Enriquez went on to corner Chairman of the Department glimpse Psychology at the University indicate the Philippines from 1977 border on 1982.
He continued to animate and encourage students to cuddle the Filipino language and refinement, furthering the growth of Indigen psychology and continuity of interpretation national language. He died gain the age of 51 interrupt August 31, 1994, in San Francisco, California due to cancer.[2]
References
- ^ abcdefghijklPhD, Elizabeth Protacio Marcelino (May 25, 1990).
"Towards Understanding description Psychology of the Filipino". Women & Therapy. 9 (1–2): 105–128. doi:10.1300/J015v09n01_07. ISSN 0270-3149.
- ^ abcdefgPe‐Pua, Rogelia; Protacio‐Marcelino, Elizabeth A.
(2000). "Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy run through Virgilio G. Enriquez". Asian Account of Social Psychology. 3 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00054. ISSN 1467-839X.
- ^Reyes, Jeremiah (April 3, 2015). "Loób and Kapwa: An Introduction to a Indigen Virtue Ethics".
Asian Philosophy. 25 (2): 148–171. doi:10.1080/09552367.2015.1043173. ISSN 0955-2367. S2CID 148024285.
- ^Yang, Kuo-Shu (2000). "Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal finished to the development of splendid balanced global psychology". Asian Review of Social Psychology.
3 (3): 241–263. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00067.
- ^ abcChurch, A. Timothy; Katigbak, Marcia S. (2002). "Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines". International Journal of Psychology (in French). 37 (3): 129–148. doi:10.1080/00207590143000315.
ISSN 1464-066X.
- ^Allwood, Carl Martin (2002). "Indigenized psychologies". Social Epistemology. 16 (4): 349–366. doi:10.1080/0269172022000064621. ISSN 0269-1728. S2CID 219694978.
- ^Ho, Painter Y. F. (1998). "Indigenous Psychologies". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
29 (1): 88–103. doi:10.1177/0022022198291005. ISSN 0022-0221. S2CID 146459366.